Benchmark replacement

A 1:1 alternative to ED 30

Two Censil grades map to ED 30, depending on the finish you're after. Both are wax-modified precipitated silicas for waterborne wood and plastic coatings, at 20–30% lower cost.

Quick answer

Which Censil grade replaces ED 30, and how close is it?

Censil660 (d50 5.0 – 5.3 μm) is the closest particle-size match to ED 30 and the one to start with for water-white clear topcoats. Censil1650A (d50 6.2 – 6.5 μm) runs coarser and is the choice when you want a lower-gloss, deep-matte surface. The ED supplier publishes ED 30 at 5.5 μm with organic surface treatment; we publish pore volume and surface area, which the ED supplier does not.

Physicochemical comparison

Each column reproduces figures from the publishing manufacturer’s own documentation, cited below the table.

ParameterED 30by the ED supplierCensil660Lead — high-clarity water-whiteCensil1650ALead — low-gloss deep-matte
Median particle size, d505.5 μm (average, light scattering)5.0 – 5.3 μm6.2 – 6.5 μm
Pore volumeNot stated in cited source1.6 – 1.8 mL/g1.6 – 1.8 mL/g
Specific surface areaNot stated in cited source250 – 280 m²/g250 – 280 m²/g
Surface treatmentOrganicWax-modified (organic / PE-wax; grade-dependent)Wax-modified (organic / PE-wax; grade-dependent)
pH7.06.0 – 8.0 (5% susp.)6.0 – 8.0 (5% susp.)
Oil absorption300 g/100gNot stated in cited sourceNot stated in cited source
SiO2 content, dryNot stated in cited source≥ 99%≥ 99%
Recommended dosageNot stated in cited source1 – 4%1 – 4%
Packaging15 kg bag20 kg multi-wall bag, palletized20 kg multi-wall bag, palletized

ED 30 column — ED supplier — Technical Information, Product Properties EMEA Region, DOC062 (© 2021). Positioning note — ED supplier website — product line page (accessed 16 Jul 2026). Censil columns — Censilcoat published grade specification, products page. “Not stated in cited source” means the value does not appear in the document cited; no figure has been estimated, inferred, or transferred between columns.

Lab-measured benchmark — application performance

Separate from the datasheet comparison above: our laboratory in Fujian ran a commercially purchased sample of ED 30 and Censil660 and Censil1650A side by side in the same waterborne acrylic clear topcoat over 2025 Q4 – 2026 Q1. Every figure below is our own parallel measurement — not a manufacturer specification. Star ratings are relative in-house assessments on identical panels.

ParameterED 30lab-measured, purchased sampleCensil660lab-measuredCensil1650Alab-measured
Median particle size d50 (measured)5.5 μm5.1 μm6.3 μm
d50 spread, Δd50±0.5 μm±0.3 μm±0.3 μm
Pore volume1.8 mL/g1.8 mL/g1.8 mL/g
Specific surface area, N₂300 m²/g265 m²/g260 m²/g
Oil absorption300 g/100 g (DBP)270 g/100 g (DBP)275 g/100 g (DBP)
pH (5% suspension)7.26.56.5
SiO₂ content, dry basis99.0%99.2%99.1%
Loss on drying, 105 °C3.5%4.5%4.8%
Surface treatmentWax-treated (organic)High-melting PE waxHigh-melting PE wax
Blushing after cure, 85% RHSlight blushing ★★★☆☆No blushing ★★★★★No blushing ★★★★★
Suspension in waterborne system, 7 daysSlight soft sedimentNo hard sedimentNo hard sediment
Clarity on dark panelHigh clarity ★★★★★Water-white ★★★★★High clarity ★★★★★
Surface smoothness (touch)★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
Matting efficiency at equal loading★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

Method notes: d50 by laser diffraction (Malvern); blushing rated after cure and conditioning at 85% relative humidity; suspension observed over 7 days in the waterborne system; matting efficiency compared at equal loading. Lab-measured values for the reference grade may differ from the manufacturer’s published specification.

The verdict

Censil660 (d50 5.0 – 5.3 μm) is the closest particle-size match to ED 30 and the one to start with for water-white clear topcoats. Censil1650A (d50 6.2 – 6.5 μm) runs coarser and is the choice when you want a lower-gloss, deep-matte surface. The ED supplier publishes ED 30 at 5.5 μm with organic surface treatment; we publish pore volume and surface area, which the ED supplier does not.

Datasheet parity is the starting point, not the proof. A 1:1 replacement is confirmed on your own line: run the Censil grade at the same dosage as your current import, compare gloss at 60° and 85°, clarity on a dark panel, touch and can stability — then fine-tune dosage within ±0.3%. Typical evaluation cycle is 1–2 weeks, and we ship a free 2 kg sample with a 1:1 benchmark sheet for exactly this.

Frequently asked questions

Is Censil660 a drop-in replacement for ED 30?

It is built as one: start at the same dosage you run today, then fine-tune within ±0.3% to land your target gloss. Datasheet parity is the starting point — the replacement is confirmed on your own line. We ship a free 2 kg sample with a 1:1 benchmark sheet for exactly this.

Should I choose Censil660 or Censil1650A?

Censil660 (d50 5.0 – 5.3 μm) for water-white clear topcoats where transparency and wood-grain depth matter. Censil1650A (d50 6.2 – 6.5 μm) for low-gloss deep-matte surfaces. If you're replacing ED 30 in a clear topcoat, start with Censil660.

The ED supplier lists ED 30 for solvent-based systems. Does that matter?

The ED supplier positions the ED series for solvent-based wood coatings and recommends its AQ, W and 7000 series for waterborne. Many Southeast Asian formulators nevertheless run ED 30 in waterborne systems. Censil grades are engineered for waterborne from the start — that is the point of the range.

What is the pore volume and surface area of ED 30?

The ED supplier does not publish numerical pore volume or BET surface area for ED 30 in its EMEA product properties table — only a graphical matting-efficiency chart. Censil660 and Censil1650A are published at 1.6 – 1.8 mL/g pore volume and 250 – 280 m²/g surface area.

What does switching cost, and what is the MOQ?

20–30% below imported ED 30 pricing, factory-direct with no distributor margin. First orders are flexible at 500 kg to 1 ton — not the 5–10 tons or full container multinational suppliers typically require.

What documentation do I get?

A 1:1 physicochemical benchmark sheet against ED 30, the relevant TDS, SDS, COA per batch.

Related benchmark pages & guides

ED 2 → Censil651ED 3 → Censil351CED 4 → Censil361COK 412 → Censil361CTS 100 → Censil3851How to choose a silica matting agentThe 6-step 1:1 replacement protocolTroubleshooting matting defects

Test it on your own line — free.

Send your resin system, target gloss and the grade you use today. We’ll ship a free 2 kg sample with a 1:1 benchmark sheet against ED 30, the relevant TDS. We reply within 24 hours.

Request a Free 2 kg Sample

Censilcoat is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by the manufacturers of the reference grades. Trademarks are used solely to identify the reference products a customer may currently use, for comparison purposes. Reference-grade figures are reproduced from the manufacturers’ published documentation as cited and were current on the page date; manufacturers may revise specifications without notice. Censil figures are typical guidance values — the controlled specification per grade is stated in the grade TDS. Performance must be verified by the customer under their own conditions.